---

From:  "Linden Hammonds" <lindenhammonds12@woltratiom.com>
Subject:  re: Your account Bob
Date:  Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:28:15 -0500
>Get the cash you need Bob!
>No credit checks No hassles.
>Simple, safe, and secure
>
>
>http://woltratiom.com/dolt/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>555A5A185E5B025B430E09225443595456504959
>http://woltratiom.com/index.html NoMorePlease
>
>
>pmb number one eighteen
>
>
>0ne six three 0 thirtieeth st
>bould-er,c0,8o3o1
>Cost aside, there are plenty of good reasons why printing your digital photographs at home may be a good idea. You get complete creative control over the printing process, almost instantaneous gratification when seeing a print come out of your printer, and the freedom to reprint photos if they don't come out just the way you want them to.
>
>But to print at home economically, you'll have to pay attention to how ink-hungry the printer you choose is, preferably before you purchase it. Some printers are known to consume more ink during operation than others, and some manufacturers charge a lot more for refills than others. It's a good idea to check online forums before purchasing a photo printer.
>
>You can also turn to third-party ink manufacturers to save on printing photographs at home. Just keep in mind that using a third-party ink will typically void the warranty on your printer; many manufacturers will not even service a unit that has been used with third-party inks. So take this into consideration before going the third-party route.
>
>Also, it's a good idea to minimize your experimentation with different photo papers. Find one or a few that work well with your photo printer, and stick to them. Going through the experimentation phase while tweaking colours and settings with different papers can consume a lot of ink and time, increasing your overall printing costs.
>
>Here are a few digital photo printers to choose from-
>
>HP Photosmart 7960 (a ZDNet Editors' Choice)
>
>The industry's first eight-color printer, the 7980 is our pick for a photo specialist. It stands out for its superior photo print quality and extra features, such as a built-in LCD to preview images and direct printing from your camera.
>
>
>Canon i560 (a ZDNet Editors' Choice)
>
>Like the Epson Stylus C84, this printer is both inexpensive and a solid performer. The i560 doesn't guzzle ink and offers something the C84 doesn't: the ability to print directly from a digital camera.
>
>
>Canon i70
>The i70 is one of the speediest inkjets around--and it's small enough to carry along on trips or to and from the office. It connects directly to digital cameras and can churn out borderless photos and 8.5x11-inch prints.
>
>
>HP Photosmart 245
>
>Another portable, lightweight option, the 245 costs less than the Canon CP-300, but doesn't come with a battery option. It produces nice-looking photos, but only in 4x6-inch and similar-sized formats.
>
>
>Canon CP-300
>
>The most compact and sleek of the portables, it's also the most expensive. If you've got the money, it includes a battery and uses the dye-sublimation technology mentioned above. Because of its small size, it only prints 4x6's.
>
>"How to print digital photos at home cheaply" brought to you by Better Digital Photography
>Headlines
>
>Extensis Portfolio 8 Now Available
>Pentax DA 10-17mm Fish-Eye lens
>Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Review � DigitalCameraInfo
>Canon Powershot A620 Review � Imaging Resource
>Kodak EasyShare V550 Review � PCMag
>
>
>
>Archives
>2004-09
>2004-10
>2004-11
>2004-12
>2005-01
>2005-02
>2005-03
>2005-04
>2005-05
>2005-06
>2005-07
>2005-08
>2005-09
>2005-10
>2005-11
>
>Fellow Wootie Maria Sanders just sent this pic of me playing the Neuser the last night of Bass Nature Camp - and it's the only one I have! Thought I'd share.
>posted by Helena Bouchez at 8:03 PM
>
>Look, I'm Famous!
>Check out the nice introduction posted by Dale Cruse, owner of BIG BOTTOM. Check it out. I'm thrilled to be a contributor, and Dale's assured me that I can blab as freely on his site as on this one -- as long as it's bass-related. However, I can't help feeling that I should reel it in just slightly. Or at least edit a little more. I noticed there is a place for comments. Uh oh.
>
>Oh my God, I just saw that my mush is on the front page of TalkBass.com too! *Gulp*
>
>Well, they asked for it.
>
>On another topic, the sting of not getting the folky gig is waning, finally. I threw the bass in a corner for a few days while I pouted, but I miss it. In fact I'm going to post this up and go play my bass right now.
>posted by Helena Bouchez at 4:55 PM
>
>Tuesday, November 29, 2005
>lenablog Gets Noticed
>Great news!
>
>Starting Saturday December 3, 2005 I am going start cross-posting my bass-related posts (90% of what a I write about here) to my new blog on BIG BOTTOM - the premiere online news magazine about bass players. From the site: We pick up stories about bassists layin' it down all over the world and in every genre. BIG BOTTOM provides the low-down lowdown.
>
>Joining me will be Pete Brunelli, another bassist and blogger who lives in Connecticut and has tremendous knowledge of acoustic/electric basses in particular.
>
>Site-owner Dale Cruse approached me after picking up the post about the Kenn Smith clinic, which then was picked up by Talkbass.com. Or something like that. I'll have to ask him the actual sequence events. Anyway, he gave me space, and I'm going for it. Kickin' it up a notch, as it were.
>
>Look for my first post reporting on Victor Wooten "Soul Circus" show at House of Blues in Chicago this Friday by about dinner time on Saturday. I hope to get lots of pictures.
>
>As for lenablog, I still need a place to talk about everyday stuff from time to time, like kicking caffiene, and the trials and tribulations of maintaining my consulting biz. Ain't no place fer such on BIG BOTTOM. It's all about Bass.
>
>Oh, I also joined Dudepit yesterday, another online bass community. Same ideas, but a little grittier than Talkbass. I like it!
>
>Still smarting a bit about the ill-fated audition, but hell, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger, right? I still wish I had some ice cream....